Online Continuing Education
Program
Case Study

Meet the Author
|
| Title |
Complications of
Chicken Pox - Acute Hepatitis and Acute Dehydration
Case Study SN0009 |
| Author |
Julee
Waldrop, RNCS, MS, FNP, PNP |
| Contact
Hours |
1.4 |
| Target
Audience: |
Pediatric
Nurses, Public Health Nurses, Family Practice Nurses, Nurse
Practitioners and other Advanced Practice Nurses |
| Purpose/Goal: |
The
nurse will be able to describe the possible complications
of varicella including the importance of prevention.
|
| |
|
Sigma
Theta Tau International is accredited as a provider of
continuing education in nursing by the American Nurses Credentialing
Center's Commission on Accreditation.
|
|
Learner Objectives: Upon completion of this case study, the learner
will be able to:
- Develop a list of nursing diagnoses and identify which is the highest
priority.
- Develop a plan of care for the presenting complaint of this child. Identify
the assessment data that supports your diagnosis of this patient.
- List two possible complications of varicella.
- Identify two risk factors associated with possible complications of
varicella.
- Discuss the developmental approach to a three-year-old in the hospital.
- Describe the current treatment for varicella.
- Discuss the current recommendations for varicella vaccine.
- Discuss possible reasons varicella vaccination is not universally given.
Meet the Author
|
Julee
Waldrop, RNCS, MS, FNP, PNP
Julee
Waldrop has recently joined the faculty of the School of Nursing
the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill as a clinical assistant
professor in the Pediatric Nurse Practitioner program. She holds
a BA in Education from the University of North Carolina (1981) and
a BSN from Texas Women's University (1986). She practiced in various
staff, educator, and management positions in in-patient care before
earning her Masters Degree and Family Nurse Practitioner certification
in 1991. She practiced for ten years at Carle Clinic Association
in Champaign, Illinois as well as teaching at the University of
Illinois Chicago's regional site in Urbana in the Family Nurse Practitioner
and the BSN programs. She earned her Pediatric Nurse Practitioner
certificate in 1994 and has been practicing as a primary care pediatric
nurse practitioner with special interest in immunizations, asthma,
and adolescent gynecology. She was inducted into Sigma Theta Tau
in 1986. She is a Fellow in the National Association of Pediatric
Nurse Practitioners (NAPNAP). She enjoys writing and writes a monthly
column and is a contributing editor for The Clinical Advisor for
Nurse Practitioners.
|
Instructions
- Read the case study.
Answer the questions at the end of the case study and click on the submit
button to have your answers checked. You will have the opportunity to
register for continuing education credit if you score 80% or higher.
- At any time in the case study you may review the references cited. References available
online are indicated by an underline. To access simply click on the article.
- Acrobat
reader may be needed to view some links in this case study.
- The web links were
checked and verified when this case study was published.
- Please report broken
links to onlinece@stti.iupui.edu.
Introduction to the case:
Anita, a three-year-old African American girl
with resolving chicken pox, presented to her primary care provider with complaints
of abdominal pain, anorexia for the past two days, and infrequent urination
with dark brown colored urine. She had swelling in the abdominal area as well
as in her left arm. A CBC with differential and electrolytes were done at
this time. She was diagnosed with possible appendicitis and dehydration and
was taken to the operating room for exploratory surgery to rule out appendicitis.
Liver function tests were ordered after surgery. She was then admitted to
the PIMCU (pediatric intermediate care unit) for post-operative care and further
evaluation.
Medical/Nursing History:
Upon admission to the pediatric intermediate
care unit after surgery, the nurse caring for Anita collected the following
information.
Prenatal History
Mother’s first pregnancy; uneventful and without complications.
Delivery
Spontaneous vaginal delivery without problems in the perinatal period.
Health History
No history of chronic illness or hospitalization. Has suffered occasional
upper respiratory infections and otitis media. Has received all of the recommended
childhood immunizations except for the varicella vaccine. Her mother reported
that her physician did not feel that it was a necessary vaccine at the time.
Family or Social History:
Anita is the only child of a single mother who
works as a certified nursing assistant. She has an extended family involved
in her life, which includes her maternal grandmother and her maternal great
grandmother. All of them were present at various times during her hospital
stay. Her father sees her occasionally but had not been present in the hospital.
Developmental Assessment
Mother reports the patient feeds herself and helps with dressing, rides
a tricycle and alternates feet when going up stairs. Likes to color, play
with dolls, and do puzzles. Patient can speak clearly in complete sentences;
mother has no problems understanding what patient says.
Response to Hospitalization
The patient has had many painful and threatening procedures performed since
her admission and is very
fearful of anyone touching her at present. Her mother is very helpful
in calming the patient and assisting the staff with procedures.
Physical Examination Findings:
Vital Signs
Respirations 28, Pulse 98 radial, BP 90/50 R arm, supine, Temperature 99.8°F
axillary, Height 36 inches, Weight 31 lb 9 oz.
Integument
Multiple healing lesions noted over entire body - most were approximately
2-5 mm in size, slightly erythematous, and either crusting or with scabs.
Skin pale underneath dark skin tone. Temperature warm to touch and dry.
Skin turgor poor on admission with slight tenting at sternum but improved
at present. Capillary refill >3 sec on admission and < 3 sec at present.
Head and Neck
Head: No masses palpated. Healing lesions on face and scalp. Facial features
symmetrical. Eyes: Clear and PERRLA (Pupils Equal Round Reactive to Light
and Accommodation), EOM (extraocular muscles) intact and no nystagmus. Ears:
Normal configuration, tympanic membranes pearl gray with positive light
reflexes and good mobility. Nose: Nasal mucosa erythematous and swollen
with clear exudate. Throat: Clear, no oral lesions or tonsillar hypertrophy.
Neck: Supple, full range of motion and strength.
Lymphatics
Mild, patchy lymphadenopathy of anterior and posterior cervical lymph node
chains (0.5 cm). Left axillary lymphadenopathy (1.0 cm). Bilateral inguinal
lymphadenopathy (1.5 cm).
Respiratory
Lungs clear with no adventitious sounds.
Cardiovascular
Heart rate 96, rhythm regular, no murmurs. Peripheral pulses 2+ and equal
bilaterally.
Abdominal
Bowel sounds present but hypoactive in all four quadrants. Per OR nurse,
abdomen was tender to light palpation especially in the right upper quadrant.
Liver margin palpable at 2 cm below the costal margin and percussed at 5
cm. Spleen non-palpable and non-tender. Currently a dressing was in place
in the upper right quadrant, 3 cm area of serosanguineous appearing drainage
circled about 2 hours ago. Ascites noted using ballottement technique.
Genitourinary
Foley catheter in place, draining dark amber urine. External genitalia normal
in appearance except for a few healing lesions similar in appearance to
those on the rest of her body on her labia and buttocks. Negative CVA tenderness.
Extremities
Moves all extremities equally. Strength: Grade five on the Lovett scale
in all extremities except the left forearm where the swelling was causing
her discomfort. Left forearm was erythematous and tender to palpation. Edema
was non-pitting. Left forearm maximum circumference was 9 cm and right forearm
was 7 cm.
Neurological Assessment
CN II-XII (cranial nerves) grossly intact. DTR’s (deep tendon reflexes)
2+ bilaterally. Communicates and responds appropriately for her age to questions
and situations.
Laboratory/Test
Data:
Abnormal lab data and possible explanations
include:
- Elevated WBCs with increased bands and lymphocytes indicative of inflammatory
processes occurring – most likely viral.
- Elevated ESR is another indication of inflammation and activated immune
response.
- Decreased Hgb, Hct, MCV, MCH, MCHC is representative of a microcytic,
hypochromic anemia. · Elevated aspartate and AST indicate that the
liver is having difficulty performing its functions, and in light of the
other laboratory findings, an inflammatory cause is likely.
- Elevated albumin is associated with liver damage.
- Elevated total bilirubin, direct and indirect, is also associated with
liver dysfunction/damage.
- Urine was amber color with a high specific gravity, positive for ketones
and urobilogenin and a few bilirubin crystals. The urinalysis concurs with
the other laboratory data indicating that the patient is dehydrated and
most likely has elevated bilirubin levels related to liver inflammation
and dysfunction (Rosenthal & Lightdale, 2000).
|
Patient
Values |
Normal
Values |
CBC
WBC
Bands
Neutrophils
Lymphocytes
Platelets
RBC Indices
Hemoglobin
Hematocrit
MCV
MCH
MCHC |
30,000
10%
30%
50%
180,000 per mm3
9.3 g/dL
29%
70 micrometers3
20 pg
25% |
11,000-20,000 conventional units
3%-8%
54%-75%
25%-40%
150,000-450,000 per mm3
10.7-12.7/dL
32%-37.1%
81-99 micrometers3
27-31 pg
32%-36%
|
|
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) |
20 |
1-9
(Landau Method) |
Electrolytes
Sodium (Na+)
Potassium (K+)
Chloride (Cl-) |
138 mEq/L
4.0 mEq/L
107 mEq/L |
135-145 mEq/L
3.4-4.7
mEq/L
98-105 mEq/L
|
Liver Function tests
Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)**
Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) |
80 U/L
180 U/L |
19-28 U/L
20-150 U/L |
|
Albumin |
1.8
g/dL |
3.0-5.0
g/dL |
Bilirubin - Total
Direct
Indirect |
3.0 g/dL
1.4 g/dL
2.6 g/dL |
0.3-1.2 g/dL
0.1-0.4 mg/dL
0.3-1.1 mg/dL |
|
Urinalysis
Color
Appearance
Odor
Specific gravity
PH
Protein
Glucose
Ketones
Blood
Bilirubin
Urobilinogen
Nitrate
Leukocyte esterase
Microscopic Analysis
RBCs
WBCs
Epithelial cells
Casts
Crystals
|
dark yellow, amber
clear
aromatic
1.050
6.8
negative
negative
positive
negative
positive
positive
negative
negative
0
0
1-2
none
few bilirubin crystals |
pale yellow to amber
clear to slightly cloudy
mildly aromatic
1.001-1.035
4.5-8.0
negative
negative
negative
negative
negative
0.1-1.0 Ehrlich units/dL
negative
negative
0-3 per HPF
0-4 per HPF
few
occasional (hyaline or granular) occasional (uric acid, urate, phosphate,
or calcium oxalate) |
*All lab values are for children.
**Previously referred to as serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT)
(Cavanaugh, 1999)
Course of Care:
It was initially thought
that this patient was suffering from appendicitis, and therefore she underwent
exploratory abdominal surgery with the resultant removal of her appendix,
which was not infected or inflamed. After surgery it was determined, based
on her lab work and further consideration of her history, that she was suffering
from complications
of varicella: acute hepatitis, local cellulitis and severe dehydration
(Bovill & Bannister, 1998). The Center for Disease Control’s Web site offers
additional
information about complications of chicken pox. There is one published
study of primary disseminated varicella that presented as acute abdominal
pain (Kim & Haycox, 1999).
Varicella is caused by the varicella-zoster virus (VZV). It is very contagious.
In healthy children most cases of varicella are mild. Symptoms include the
classic vesicular-pustular rash, fever, malaise, and urticaria associated
with the lesions. The illness usually lasts about five to seven days and
is self-limited (Costello, 1999).
Though the varicella vaccine has been available since 1995, potential barriers
to vaccination identified by the CDC (Centers for Disease Control) include
perception that varicella is mild and vaccination is not warranted, concerns
about long-lasting immunity and effectiveness of the vaccine, stringent
vaccine storage and handling requirements (Varivax must be frozen until
it is reconstituted for injection, and the vaccine must be discarded 30
minutes after reconstitution.), vaccine availability and cost, and inadequate
insurance coverage (Costello, 1999).
Management of this patient includes both medical and nursing issues.
Rehydration
Upon admission the patient was severely dehydrated with an estimated 10
percent body weight loss. She received fluid
resuscitation, and since surgery her fluid status has improved with
an increase in her urinary output. The patient is currently receiving D5
1/2NS at 50 cc/hr. Strict I & O is also ordered.
Pain Management
To control
pain, the patient is receiving morphine (.15 mg at 10 min intervals;
max 3.6 mg/4hr) per PCA and has Tylenol (acetaminophen) (210 mg q 3-4 hours)
ordered for later. She also has Benadryl (diphenhydramine) 25 mg ordered
for itching (possible side effect of morphine) prn.
Post-op Care
Care was for that of a general surgical patient and included airborne and
contact isolation. Universal precautions are needed until the diagnosis
of varicella is confirmed. The contagious period for varicella is approximately
2 days before lesions appear until they have crusted over. At this time,
all lesions are crusted over so contagion is unlikely. If the lesions were
still active, once varicella infection became part of the diagnosis, respiratory
precautions should be taken for anyone who has not been vaccinated
for chicken pox or had the disease.
Activity was as tolerated and diet ad lib. Because of possible electrolyte
imbalance, she was placed on a cardiac monitor and continuous pulse oximetry.
Varicella management
Although varicella infection is the initiating event in this patient’s current
illness, there is no specific
therapy that can be used to improve her condition at this point.
Infection
Although her varicella infection and her hepatitis will not respond to antimicrobials,
she is placed on Cephalexin (cephalexin) 250 mg IV q 8 hrs for cellulitis
of the left arm and her risk of infection following surgery.
Anemia
She was also placed on oral iron supplementation Fer-in-sol 1.2 ml bid (ferrous
sulfate) because her lab work revealed anemia
as well.
First day post-op
After a good night’s sleep Anita was in much better spirits. Her foley catheter
was removed and she had no problems getting out of bed and going to the
bathroom. She was started on oral Tylenol (acetaminophen) after she tolerated
her lunch well. Her IV and PCA were discontinued that evening and she was
given oral antibiotics instead.
Second day post-op
Anita was progressing as expected and was discharged in the morning. Discharge
teaching needs focused on
- Education about take-home
medications: Ibuprofen, Fer-in-Sol, Cephalexin (cephalosporin)
- Ibuprofen should
be dosed every 8 hours as needed for post-op pain. As with all medications,
ibuprofen is metabolized by the liver; this patient’s recent liver
inflammation and damage may interfere with its metabolism. Careful
observation for a return of liver symptoms during administration of
this and all her medicines is warranted.
- Fer-in-Sol is
a liquid preparation of an iron supplement to treat her anemia. The
patient and her family should understand that this should be taken
daily, and care should be taken to limit contact with the teeth because
of risk of staining. Drinking the medicine through a straw is a good
trick to prevent this.
- Cephalexin is
a first generation cephalosporin with good coverage for staphylococci
- a common cause of cellulitis. The patient should take this product
with milk or food to limit GI upset. She should also finish the entire
course of the drug.
- Signs and symptoms
of infection or worsening of hepatitis.
- Importance of keeping
follow-up appointments to re-evaluate liver function, cellulitis, and
anemia.
- Education
- about
vaccinations
- vaccine
cost for her future children
- promoting
knowledge about varicella vaccine
- cost-effectiveness
of vaccines for the general population.
References
Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices to the Centers for Disease Control (1999) Prevention of varicella updated recommendations of the advisory committee on immunization practices (ACIP) MMWR48 (RR06), 1-5. Retrieved December 11, 2001, from http://www.cdc.gov/epo/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr4806a1.htm.
Ball, J. & Bindler, R. (1999) Pediatric Nursing Caring for Children, 2nd Ed. (pp.32-38). Stamford, CT: Appleton & Lange.
Bovill, B., & Bannister, B. (1998). Review of 26 years’ hospital admissions for chickenpox in north London. Journal of Infection 36 (suppl 1), 17-21.
Cavanaugh, B.M. (1999). Nurse’s Manual of Laboratory and Diagnostic Tests (3rd Ed) Philadelphia, PA: FA Davis.
Centers for Disease Control (1998a). Recommendations to Prevent and Control
Iron Deficiency in the United States MMWR 47 (RR-3), 1-36. Retrieved December
11, 2001, from http://www.cdc.gov/epo/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00051880.htm.
Centers for Disease Control (2001) Vaccines For Children Program. Information for Health Care Providers. Retrieved January 17, 2002, from http://www.cdc.gov/nip/vfc/Provider/VFCBrochureHealthCare.htm.
Centers for Disease Control (1998b). Varicella-related deaths among children – United States, 1997 MMWR 47 (18), 365-368. Retrieved December 11, 2001, from http://www.cdc.gov/epo/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00052600.htm.
Centers for Disease Control (n.d.). Varicella-Zoster, Vaccine and Treatment. Retrieved December 11, 2001, from http://www.cdc.gov/nip/diseases/varicella.
Centers for Disease Control (1997). Facts about Chicken Pox. Retrieved December 11, 2001, from http://www.cdc.gov/od/oc/media/fact/chickenp.htm.
Centers for Disease Control (n.d.). Varicella (Chicken pox). Chickenpox: What are serious complications from chicken pox? Retrieved January 17, 2002 from http://www.cdc.gov/nip/publications/niiw/PDF/SampleOpEdChickenpox.pdf.
Centers for Disease Control (n.d.). Varicella (Chicken pox). Chickenpox: It’s more serious than you think. Retrieved January 17, 2002 from http://www.cdc.gov/nip/publications/niiw/PDF/SampleOpEdChickenpox.pdf.
Children’s Hospital of Iowa (n.d.). Acute Pain Management for Pediatric Patients Virtual Children’s Hospital. Retrieved December 20, 2001, from:
http://www.vh.org/Providers/ClinGuide/PediatricPainMgmt/acutepainmanagement.html.
Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) (1999). Prevention of varicella updated recommendations of the advisory committee on immunization practices (ACIP). MMWR May 28/48(RR06):1-5. Retrieved December 11, 2001, from http://www.cdc.gov/epo/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr4806a1.htm.
Costello, C.A. (1999). The varicella vaccine, inching toward universal use. ADVANCE for Nurse Practitioners, December: 47-50. Retrieved December 11, 2001, from http://www.advancefornp.com/editorial/np/12-1-1999/p47.html?frominc=editorial&pub=ADVANCE+for+Nurse+Practitioners&issuedate=12%2F1%2F1999&searchstring=chickenpox
Eland, J.M. & Banner, W., Jr. (1992). Assessment and management of pain
in children. In M.F.Hazinski (Ed.), Nursing care of the critically ill child
(2nd Ed.), (pp 79-100). St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book.
Kim, S.H. & Haycox, C. (1999). Primary disseminated varicella presenting as an acute abdomen. Pediatric Dermatology,16(3), 208-210.
Markham, M.H. & Darville, T. (1999). Morbidity and cost of vaccine-preventable varicella in previously health children in Arkansas. The Journal of Arkansas Medical Society, 96(7), 260-262.
MMWR (1998) Varicella-related deaths among children—United States, 1997. MMWR May 15/47(18), 365-368.
Niederhauser, V. (1999). Varicella: The vaccine and the public health debate. The Nurse Practitioner 24(3), 74-92. www.tnpj.com.
Rosenthal, P. & Lightdale, J.R. (2000). Laboratory evaluation of hepatitis. Pediatrics in Review 21, 178. .
Vincent, C.V.H. (2001). Nurses’ analgesic practices with hospitalized children. Journal of Child and Family Nursing, 4(2). Retrieved December 19, 2001, from
http://www.nursingcenter.com/ce/test/article.cfm?id=385CE55D-1D5F-11D5-AF22-0002A513AF96
Test Questions
Please select the correct
answer for each of the following questions. If you answer 80% or more correctly,
you will be given the opportunity to register for continuing education credit.
After receipt of the registration information and fee, a continuing education
certificate will be mailed to you.
Question 1
What information in the history is most important
in the immediate care of this patient?
Swollen left arm
Anorexia and infrequent urination
Daughter of a single mother
Lack of varicella vaccine
Question 2
Which of the following physical findings is
least pertinent to the diagnosis and care of this patient?
Ascites
Multiple healing lesions
Mild, patchy lymphadenopathy
Dark amber colored urine
Question 3 What
is the most significant lab value in assisting with the diagnosis of this
patient?
Liver function tests, especially Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)
CBC with differential
Bilirubin
Electrolytes
Question 4
In interacting with this patient in a developmentally
appropriate manner, the nurse should remember:
Erikson’s trust vs. mistrust stage
Never use restraints on a three-year-old
Three-year-olds behave better if their parents are not in the room during
procedures.
Piaget’s Theory of Development
Question 5
What is the highest priority nursing diagnosis
for this patient upon arrival in the PIMCU after surgery?
Alteration in comfort related to patient’s complaints of severe abdominal
pain and post-operative status
Fluid volume deficit related to decreased urinary output
Infection control related to chicken pox
Lack of knowledge related to vaccine for varicella
Question 6
What could have prevented this patient’s illness?
Good fluid intake during chicken pox illness
Post-exposure vaccination for chicken pox
Antibiotics
Varicella vaccine
Question 7
Vaccination rates for chicken pox were 43.2
percent in 1998. What may be a contributing factor to this low rate?
Costs too much
Side effects
Perception that varicella is mild and vaccination is not warranted
Ineffectiveness of vaccine
Question 8
What is the most common complication from varicella?
Pneumonia
Bacterial infections of skin and soft tissue
Encephalitis
Hepatitis